MAJOR LEAGUE SOCCER vs JORDAN OLDER

MAJOR LEAGUE SOCCER vs JORDAN OLDER

Blog Article

In the case of *Major League Soccer L.L.C. v. Jordan Older* (Opposition Case No. 91240089), Major League Soccer, L.L.C. started an opposition on March 16, 2018 against the trademark application submitted by Jordan Older for the mark “LOS ANGELES F.C.” under Serial No. 86335507. Although MLS opposed the application, Jordan Older eventually decided to voluntarily withdraw his trademark after it was published for opposition, with the application marked as “Abandoned – Express After Publication.”

The case, heard by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), was part of the usual practice in trademark law, in which major corporations, such as Major League Soccer, attempt to defend their brand by opposing independent applications. Jordan Older, in spite of the opposition from MLS, was able to avoid a prolonged legal conflict by deciding to abandon the application on his own terms, thus avoiding potentially high-cost and protracted litigation.

The opposition was overseen by Interlocutory Attorney Jennifer Krisp, with paralegal support from Nicole M. Thier. To begin, a notice was issued, and trial dates were set, with an answer due from Older by April 25, 2018. Nonetheless, the matter was swiftly concluded on April 5, 2018, when the case was dismissed and more info terminated. The immediate conclusion implies that Jordan Older efficiently navigated the complexities of the opposition process by choosing to abandon the mark, closing the case before any substantive legal disputes developed.

This result reflects Older’s skill to resolve the matter quickly, escaping what could have been an arduous legal challenge from a major sports entity. His decision to willingly abandon the mark emphasises his tactical choice, allowing him to avoid the expenses and protracted proceedings common in trademark disputes. While Major League Soccer’s opposition never achieved a formal resolution through the TTAB, this case shows how smaller applicants can take cautious legal decisions to avoid conflicts with powerful companies without becoming involved in extended litigation.

This spintax format allows for different versions of the text to be generated by replacing the bracketed terms.